They prefer to remain away from anything that is banned by law. Thus, if gambling is made illegal, its detrimental effects may be substantially reduced. Making gambling illegal can solve many of the problems associated with it. Crime is best curbed through the use of law and order. If addiction to gambling is entitled to punishment, gambling. Number of problem gamblers in the UK rises to more than 400,000 This article is more than 2 years old Gambling Commission report finds more than 2 million people are addicted to gambling or at.
- Arguments For Banning Online Gambling Sites
- Arguments For Banning Online Gambling Services
- Arguments For Banning Online Gambling Games
- Arguments For Banning Online Gambling Game
The religious arguments against gambling (by “religious” we are referring solely to Christianity) tend to make a series of assumptions about the motivations of the typical gambler andhis/her relationship with money.
The gambler, according to the religious perspective, is driven by greed, a lust for money and, in particular, money won rather than money earned.
Having established this set of assumptions, the religious logic associates gambling with broader, more explicit “sins” – such as laziness, slothfulness and so on.
The religious argument is therefore based on a particular stereotype – shifty, lazy, seeking to win at the expense of others, contributing nothing to society in return.
While this characterization may reflect some small percentage of the gambling demographic, as a whole – that is, as a stereotype – it misrepresents the reality.
As stated in the introduction, recent surveys and statistical studies reveal that most people that frequent casinos do so out of pure desire for entertainment. Most have spending limits in placebefore entering a casino.
Most casino visitors do not, and will not, develop bad gambling habits. Often, a visit to a casino occurs on a vacation. (So much for slothfulness…)
However, there are real and essential historical reasons for the advancement of the religious arguments against gambling. It is important to be aware of that context so that one can appreciatethe other side of the argument.
This appreciation can sometimes help others appreciate your argument in return.
Historically, religion was one of the few social navigating forces available to American society. For many, the moral rightness of the Christian dogmas, and the proliferations of interpretationit spawned, guided political action and legislative policy.
Religious leaders often saw themselves as the protectors of the lower classes. Often, they were. It is therefore without surprise that they would take a dim view on gambling.
On one hand, casinos, accurately, had a reputation as the playpens of the idle rich indulging in debaucheries and excesses only they could afford.
On the other hand, unregulated casinos owned and operated by the rich could be seen as preying upon the lower, uneducated and, at times, economically vulnerable working classes.
Given these real and accurate contexts, the naturally conservative religious leader would see any form of gambling as, at best, a gray area (since it was not addressed explicitly in the Bible)that ultimately contributed nothing to the lives of working class families.
At worst, the gambling subculture seemed aligned with undercurrents that threatened the moral structure of those same families while undermining the authority and social position of the clergy.
Times have changed. These days, there is strict government control in those states where gambling is legalized. The era of the criminal syndicate-run casinos is long gone and along with it is thesubculture in which it once existed.
Casinos these days – at least, the main strip type you are most likely to encounter – are corporate-owned and operated. They deal in entertainment. The last thing they want is a scandal. They arefully onboard with government regulation because they know it is better for business.
It can certainly be argued that, at some time in even recent history (early 20th century), the contemporary conditions of societies were helped and protected by taking a conservativeperspective and approach to the casino and gambling subculture.
These days, that conservative ideology, as interpreted by religious teachings, may best be served by an individual’s personal choice. Society, so it would appear, has moved on.
However, social progress in regards to casino gambling may yet be in question, as we continue to explore more arguments against gambling as they exist in non-religious circles.
Whether people should be permitted to gamble online, or gamble at all actually, is an issue that many people are passionate about, on both sides of the fence. In spite of gambling becoming much more accepted in the 21st Century than in the past, there still are a lot of people that are against it, to the extent that lawmakers continue to face huge challenges in looking to update the laws and better regulate it.
We do take a pretty permissive attitude toward how people spend their money, generally, although there are certain activities that have been historically been deemed to be vices, and significant enough vices to invoke the power of criminal law to look to punish such activities.
The use of criminal law should never be taken lightly, and as it generally applies to protecting people from serious infringements by others, to the extent of causing clear and significant material damages, either to one’s person or one’s property, criminal law can involve any sort of acts that lawmakers deem fit to legislate against, and this often spills over into matters that would otherwise be considered matters of personal liberty.
This can come down to the government deciding how one may spend one’s money, and where criminalized vices are concerned, you will be punished for spending your money on such things, whether this be things like recreational drugs, sex for money, or gambling.
The vice of prostitution in itself sheds some light on what may be behind a lot of this reticence, it’s actually rather odd that this would ever be seen as a crime, provided it involves a mutually beneficial contract between consenting adults, but given that this sort of contract meets with disfavor with many people, that is sufficient to look to ban and prosecute it.
We tend to not think pretty deeply about some of these issues, and much remains for the most part unexamined, and when people stop and think about the reasons why gambling and online gambling in particular may be wrong enough to prohibit, or at least try to, since online gambling prohibition is of very limited influence, we often will look to come up with a number of arguments, but this often comes down to mere disapproval.
Arguments For Banning Online Gambling Sites
Best USA Online Casinos for 2020
Comparison of Top US Gambling Sites
- Instant Play & Download
- Over 250+ Online Slots
- 4-8 Hr. Payout Time
- #1 Overall US Casino
- Visa, MC, Amex, BTC
- Fast Cashouts (3 Hrs.)
- Excellent Reputation
- Online Since 2007
- 3-6 Hr. Payout Time
- Great Site for Mobile
- Play 300+ RTG Games
- 3-6 Hr. Payout Time
- 250% Deposit Match
- Great Ongoing Bonuses
- Fast Payout Times
What Makes Gambling So Different Than Other Discretionary Spending?
Of course there are lots of things that others do that we may not approve of but we tolerate, so what makes something like gambling different? Well it does have roots in religious beliefs, the idea that gambling is a sin, and even in countries which do at least purport to not allow religious beliefs color the law still see it rear its ugly head in some situations, and this is one of them.
Some countries do not have such a separation of course, and religion may shape their laws quite substantially, and many acts considered to be sins are outlawed, in some Muslim countries in particular. It is hard to imagine legalized gambling ever coming to some of these countries, at least in our lifetimes anyway.
The truth is, many people still find gambling to be distasteful personally, and many also believe that gambling is a sin according to their religious beliefs, and also believe that it is the place of the law to prohibit certain sinful behavior, so this still plays a role to a certain extent, and in some places more than others.
Neither of these reasons should be the least bit persuasive though, and while still fairly popular, several at least seemingly more practical issues have become more prominent in recent years, including one that has been around for a long time, the idea of using paternalism to regulate people’s behavior.
So either gambling isn’t seen as good for you, or isn’t good for a certain percentage of gamblers, and therefore there is harm done by allowing people to gamble, and the government should be out to reduce harm.
This argument doesn’t account for the benefit side of this though, the entertainment and pleasure that gambling provides, and it also looks to take a broader approach to the problem than would be sensible, seeking to prevent anyone from doing this given a few become harmed, or rather, harming themselves.
We Need to Take A Balanced Approach Here
The issues of problem gambling or problem drinking or what have you require that we balance the need of these people without unduly interfering with the rights of others to live their lives and spend their money as they see fit, so to the extent that harm is even an appropriate consideration here, it isn’t in the overwhelming majority of gambling, as no harm is visited upon anyone.
Those who don’t enjoy the practice and don’t partake in it can easily and conveniently ignore the benefit side of things and this is why when the majority of the population doesn’t gamble, the idea of prohibiting or restricting it can become popular enough.
With online gambling, the idea that people can partake in it at their leisure tends to scare these folks even more, but the truth is that there’s really nothing we can do to stop this, people who want to gamble online will do so to their heart’s content regardless of what the laws are, due to the very nature of online gambling being a solely private experience.
There are also fears raised that being more permissive toward gambling will allow criminal elements to be benefited, although ironically, it’s the other way around, if you make it a crime then it is then that criminal elements may step in, at least when it comes to land based gambling.
Arguments For Banning Online Gambling Services
Even when it is legal, such as in Las Vegas in earlier times, if it’s not regulated properly than you can indeed have organized crime participating, as was the case then. This is not an argument for prohibition, it’s one for policing it better.
Arguments For Banning Online Gambling Games
Online gambling takes this right out of the picture though, there’s no need for criminals to become involved here on the operational side anyway, although with online gambling the worry is that they will use this to launder money. This just means we need to be diligent towards this, as we already are, and isn’t a reason sufficient to prohibit anyone from playing, and once again, not that we really can anyway.
So there are a number of reasons put forth against online gambling, that it is a sin, that it is simply wrong without needing to provide reasons because as long as enough of us agree we don’t need any, that some people harm themselves with it so no one should be allowed to do it, and that criminals will be benefited so we need to just try to shut it down.
Arguments For Banning Online Gambling Game
None of these reasons are sufficient though, although the will of those in power is what ultimately prevails, whether that be a matter of popularity in a democracy or the will of the leadership in more autocratic forms of government. Fortunately though we’ve made a lot of progress in getting folks to open their minds more and examine the facts here more closely and this hopefully will continue to progress.
Comments are closed.