Author Collin Moshman
- Heads Up Poker Tips and Suggestions Playing Heads Up poker may not be quite as popular as some of the other online gambling styles, but it is still possible to make a nice bitcoin profit if you know what you are doing.
- Top Ten Heads Up Poker Tips If you're new to the heads up game, you can really get crushed by rushing in blindly. Proper heads up strategy is vastly different than normal No Limit Hold'em Strategy, and you need to make the correct adjustments in order to beat your opponents and make money.
Heads-up Pre-flop Betting: The small blind can fold, call or raise. If the small blind just calls, then the big blind (non-button player) can either check and see the flop, or raise.
Find out how to qualify for this book in the Two Plus Two poker bonus program
Synopsis of Heads-Up No-Limit Hold 'em
Heads-up confrontations can occur in any game, even when every seat is occupied. Adjusting to the amount of aggression can be difficult since heads-up battles require you to bet and raise with many hands. This book covers heads-up tournaments, cash matches, the final two of a multi-table tournament, and blind-vs-blind play at fuller tables. Mastering heads-up no-limit hold ‘em is invaluable if you’re looking to add a loose-aggressive component to your game.
With more heads-up matches available, becoming proficient in them is highly profitable. This text is the first strategy book devoted to no-limit heads-up play. You will learn to: 1. Master expected value, equity, and heads-up fundamentals 2. Play and exploit the most common playing styles 3. Manipulate the pot size based on your hand and your opponent 4. Attack button limps, bluff multiple streets, and play aggressively 5. Distinguish between optimal tournament and cash strategies 6. Exploit your opponents through metagame mastery 7. Maximize your profits through game theory and business concepts.
So if you are an aspiring heads-up professional, or are just challenged to a one-on-one battle, Heads-Up No-Limit Hold ’em provides you with the tools you need for success.
Excerpt from the Book Heads-Up No-Limit Hold 'em: Three-Betting Preflop
To continue our discussion facing button raises, we now address three-betting in more detail. This first section discusses an advanced play that works well against thinking, aggressive opponents, particularly those who raise liberally from the button preflop. It requires having already played tightly from the big blind, which if you follow the advice given so far you will be doing.
Suppose you are facing an aggressive player’s button raise. You know it could mean many different hands, but you don’t have a hand that figures to be a favorite, or at least a significant enough favorite to build a large pot out of position. But it has potential. In particular, good candidates include T9o, T8s, 54s, or a small pair.
You have been folding to most button raises, and you now make a small reraise. Against such a small reraise, it is unlikely your opponent will fold preflop. If he plays back before the flop, you fold. When he calls, you lead out on any flop for a one-half to two-thirds pot bet. If you miss the flop and he calls or raises, you are done with the hand (unless you improve to a strong holding on the turn).
The reasoning behind this play is that an intelligent player will tend to think that someone who has been tight from the big blind and unexpectedly makes a small reraise may be doing so because he wants action with a strong hand. Unless your opponent connects with the flop in some way, he will usually concede the hand.
This play is a way to be the one showing the greatest strength preflop, and therefore the natural one to take it down after the flop, without committing a lot of chips. Plus, you can always win a big pot when you flop a strong hand and your opponent connects as well.
Effective stacks: $1,500
Blinds: $10-$20
Note: Your opponent plays a solid tight-aggressive style, raising about 50 percent of his hands preflop, and you have been inactive facing button raises.
How Betting Works In Poker
Your hand: T8
Action: Your opponent raises to $60 from the button. You reraise to $115 in the big blind and he calls. The pot is $230.
Flop: K72
Action: You bet $130 and your opponent folds.
Analysis: Unless your opponent has a king, it will be difficult for him to stay in this hand. You have shown significant strength, and, due to your earlier tightness, there is no reason for him to believe you are bluffing.
When your opponent does play back, you need to be careful. For instance, if the flop had been J82, and he raised your post-flop leadout bet, then more often than not, you will be facing at least top pair or perhaps second pair with a higher kicker. You have shown significant strength on two betting rounds, yet your tight-aggressive opponent still wants to build a big pot. So it is likely he has the best hand. You might call if the raise was small and the stacks deep enough that the implied odds to draw to your five-outer (the three tens and two eights) were there, but generally, when an opponent plays back at you in this situation, give him credit for a real hand and fold.
And finally, remember that the small three-bet is an advanced play to be used sparingly against players who are both aggressive and perceptive. But against a different type of opponent, this play can and should become a money loser.
Another variation on three-betting is the three-overbet. Sometimes when you are the big blind and the button raises, you should make a larger-than-normal reraise to simplify further decision-making. By “larger-than-normal,” I mean at least five times the button’s raise. There are several conditions that make this play particularly beneficial:
- You have a robust yet non-premium hand.
- You do not feel that you can significantly outplay your opponent with conventional strategy. And,
- Your stack does not significantly exceed 10 times the button’s raise-size.
Let us look at an example where all these criteria are optimal, and then change the conditions to see how they affect our willingness to make a three overbet.
Villain: $2,100
You: $900
Blinds: $25-$50
Note: Villain is an online professional heads-up player.
Your hand: 44
Action: Villain raises on the button to $150.
Analysis: This is an excellent time to execute a three-overbet by reraising all-in. A smaller raise will tend to pot-commit us, and pocket pairs play well in case of a call since two high cards significantly outnumber pairs from a hand combination perspective.
Action: We reraise all-in for $900 and Villain folds.
Now let us modify each of the criteria and consider their effects on our decision. First, suppose our hand was A2 rather than 44. When our opponent folds, we win the hand regardless. But when he calls, the pair will often be a slight favorite. By contrast, unless he perceives us as being hyper loose-aggressive, his calling hand range consists primarily of hands that have us behind as a 70-to-30 underdog — stronger aces and pocket pairs. And we are only a slight favorite against the remainder of his possible calling hands, such as king-ten suited or king-queen offsuit.
Similarly, hands such as
8 7
are more favorable than Weak High Card Hands such as
K 2
simply because the mid suited connectors will tend to be live, whereas a kicker-less king will often be dominated. So with K2, we should be inclined to fold rather than three-overbet.
Next, suppose our opponent was much weaker, perhaps tight-passive. Then not only might we worry about the strength represented by a passive player’s raise, but folding leaves us with an excellent opportunity to regain a stack by chipping away at this player. In particular, simply by playing a standard loose-aggressive style, you will have a considerable edge if the match progresses normally. So you would be much less inclined to go for a potentially match-ending three-overbet.
Lastly, suppose we again have a small pair against a much better opponent, but the money is significantly deeper with a shorter stack of $4,000. Raising $4,000 to win the $200 on the table risks too much for a small reward. We could instead make our three-overbet a more conventional $750, which indeed works well when we get an immediate fold, or when he calls and we spike a set. But those times our opponent four-bets us all-in, or calls and we miss, creates a difficult spot for us. In the first case, we must either forfeit our large chip investment, or call another $3,250. And against a flat-call and missed flop, we will be playing a huge pot, out of position, generally facing three overcards. This is clearly a situation to avoid.
Other Poker Books Written by Collin Moshman
More Books from Two Plus Two Publishing
Betting Rules In Poker
More Texas Hold'em rule questions: What is the exact structure of betting the blinds (pre-flop) in a head-to-head match?I've been playing Hold'em for a while now, and only recently had a head to head match with a friend. If there's only two of us, how do the blinds work? If he's the dealer, and I post the small blinds, and he posts the big blinds, do I then bet before the flop? How exactly does betting occur before the flop? Can someone walk me through the exact sequence of events?
Bonus question: I'm just starting to get an inkling for 'position play' i.e. how to bet in relation to where you are in the deal... What's the prevailing wisdom, if any, for position play in a head-to-head match?
and then you bet first every time post flop
position play heads up has a lot to do with the cards you receive. and how the small blind has bet previously
posted by CCK at 5:30 PM on August 3, 2005
So basically
deal
dealer starts first round of betting
flop
other guy starts second round of betting
turn
other guy
river
other guy
I feel that position is minimized during heads-up and that pot odds and strategy matter more. Pay attention to the odds your getting on you hands. Since play in heads-up is so aggressive this can help you figure out what large bets to call. There are a lot of good theory books that cover specific strategies but heads-up is a pretty personal thing. You have to develop your own style and experiment until you find a strategy that works for you. What any person recommends might not work for the way you play, no matter how qualified they are.
posted by cyphill at 5:44 PM on August 3, 2005
Later in the hand, you have several options in first position. If your hand is strong, a check-raise is a good play if you think your opponent will raise. If he probably won't raise, then bet. With a bad hand, check or bluff if you think you can get away with it. If your hand is mediocre, then bet if your opponent is more likely to call than he would be to bet if you had checked. Check if he is more likely to bet. Only check and fold with a bad had.
To really optimize your play, you have to be able to evaluate your expectations in the hand. Sklansky's book The Theory of Poker is a good teaching reference.
[Also, CCK is correct: the dealer posts the big blind, other player posts the small blind and is the first to act before the flop.]
posted by ijoshua at 5:50 PM on August 3, 2005
(advice post to follow)
posted by mosch at 6:02 PM on August 3, 2005
(Note: it agrees that in heads-up situations, the button is the small blind.)
posted by mosch at 6:20 PM on August 3, 2005
posted by cyphill at 6:25 PM on August 3, 2005
posted by ijoshua at 6:29 PM on August 3, 2005
What you raise from here depends on the ratio of the blinds to your stacks. If your stacks are > 30x the blinds, you don't really want to get out of line. Raise with pretty much any hand that would be playable from late position in a ring game. Raise with more hands against tight opponents and also if the ratio of the stacks to the blinds is low. (This progression is why you see such 'trashy' hands played when you watch poker on television...)
If you're the big blind, you're out of position for the rest of the hand, so your goal is to end the hand as quickly as possible. You want to play very aggressively with any decent holding, and get yourself back onto the small-blind/button.
Many heads-up matches can be won simply by constantly attacking from position. Make sure you're on the right side of those attacks.
posted by mosch at 7:09 PM on August 3, 2005
The real problem is if you make the dealer the big blind, the small blind is correct to play extremely tight because they have little money in the pot, and will be out of position for the entirety of the hand. This makes for an excrutiating game, unless the players are terrible.
posted by mosch at 7:11 PM on August 3, 2005
these (and more) are things you should be able to figure out with time and observation.
From there you want to use your position to:
1) bet/raise for value - you probably have the better hand. Against an opponent who is playing too loose, this is pretty much the only type of betting you'll do.
2) bet/raise for fold equity - you have no reason to believe you have the better hand... but you do believe your opponent will fold enough to make the bet profitable.
When evaluating this type of play, just look at it mathematically. If the ratio of the bet size to the pot size is lower than the probability of a call, it's an automatic long-term profit.
3) escape danger - you get to act last which means you can maneuver to try to get free cards and cheap showdowns... you should have a fairly decent idea of what your opponent is going to do, whereas he should have almost no clue what you're going to do... this makes your life easy.
There's far more than I can possibly fit into a mefi answer, but hopefully that's a start for you!
posted by mosch at 7:36 PM on August 3, 2005
posted by mullacc at 10:46 PM on August 3, 2005
1. If everyone calls the blinds (no raises), do the small or the big blind have the ability to raise?
2. Why, in Robert's rules of poker, does it say that players cannot play from chip racks? What's the reason behind this rule?
posted by asavage at 11:24 PM on August 3, 2005
2. I've been to card rooms that allow it and some that don't. In AZ and Vegas, I seem to remember playing from racks but not in CA. I like playing from racks much better.
posted by mullacc at 11:36 PM on August 3, 2005
2. Playing chips from chip racks slows down the game (fiddling with getting chips out and putting them back in) and allows the player to screw around with the game. For example, playing from two stacked racks that look full, but really the bottom one is half empty. Or playing with a chip or two hidden beneath the rack. Makes it harder for opponents to calculate how much you could potentially put in the pot (although they can ask for your chip count).
Slowing down the game might not seem that important, but the profit you make at poker comes from exploiting your opponent's mistakes. Maximizing the number of hands per hours naturally maximizes your profit along with it. That's one of the reasons why online poker can be so good to professionals; a live table might give you 30-40 hands per hour, a table on the net might give you 50-70, but on the net you can play 4 tables at once, for more than 200 hands per hour. Of course your efficiency goes down the more tables you play, so you have to find a comfortable spot. In live play you can't really multitable, stuck with one table only. Anything to make the game faster is good for you.
So, are you guys doing an episode on poker? Are there any good poker myths, at that? :)
posted by splice at 3:59 AM on August 4, 2005
posted by fletchmuy at 5:21 AM on August 4, 2005
You can't play with racks on the table because you can't always see what's under them (cards, money, chips, who knows what else). You pretty much can't play with anything on the table except chips and cards.
Much of the advice that mosch gave above is quite good. A lot of it is contained in books on the subject of holdem (or other poker books -- his advice is not specific to holdem). I recommend Sklansky's Theory of Poker, or his book 'Texas Holdem for Advanced Players' or his book on winning Low Limit Holdem. He is a master at making these kind of subtleties clear, and I've found that although I was a good player before I started reading books, I now know *why* I do some things, I do some other things different and I do some things I did before much, much better. Reading about these things also gives you a terrific functional vocabulary to discuss these things with friends, and the ability to *think* about them away from the table.
posted by RustyBrooks at 5:50 AM on August 4, 2005
Thanks mulacc. All of the better players I know can think about the game in this fashion. It's been pimped many times in this thread, but 'Theory of Poker' is really the ultimate text for learning how to think like this. It also defines the standard vocabulary for discussing these things.
1. If everyone calls the blinds (no raises), do the small or the big blind have the ability to raise?
Yes. Additionally, some people like to 'straddle'. A straddle is when the player to the left of the big blind makes a blind raise before getting cards, which effectively acts as a very big blind. In return, this player gets to act last pre-flop.
Note: straddles are nearly always chip suicide, but they're usually legal, and live.
Why, in Robert's rules of poker, does it say that players cannot play from chip racks? What's the reason behind this rule?
It's SLOW. It's against the rules at most casinos but if you're playing badly, most players (myself included) will let you keep doing it, without asking you or the dealer to fix the situation.
Most casinos will let you keep the racks on the table, so long as you have a working stack that's not in the rack. Personally, I don't see the appeal of a rack... a huge pyramid of chips is just so much sexier.
A lot of it is contained in books on the subject of holdem (or other poker books -- his advice is not specific to holdem)
7 card stud players:
SuperSystem - the stud chapter by Mike Caro
7 Card Stud For Advanced Players - by Zee, Sklansky and Malmuth
Holdem beginners:
Winning Low Limit Holdem - Lee Jones
Getting Started In Holdem - Ed Miller
(I forget what it's called) - Gary Carson
Limit Holdem (more advanced):
Holdem Poker for Advanced Players
Small Stakes Holdem - Ed Miller (it's really about maximizing value against loose opponents... which happens to be common in small stakes games, but also applies cleanly to the 20/40 and 40/80 games I frequent)
No-Limit Holdem (more advanced):
Super/System (or S/S 2) - Brunson's NLHE Chapter.
Tournament Poker:
Harrington on Holdem Volume 1 & 2- Dan Harrington - Almost all the stuff in this book used to be 'figure it out yourself'. I'm still not sure how I feel about a book this good documenting portions of strategy that most players get wrong.
Limit Omaha/8 or Stud/8:
High/low Split Poker - Ray Zee
Pot-limit Omaha:
Omaha Holdem Poker - Ciaffone
Pot-limit and No-limit poker - Ciaffone and Reuben
How good is my pot-limit omaha? - Reuben
Understanding poker:
The Theory of Poker - Sklansky
Psychology and Poker:
Ace on the River - Greenstein
posted by mosch at 11:09 AM on August 4, 2005 [4 favorites]
Inside the Poker Mind - Feeney
Psychology of Poker - Schoonmaker
Ace on the River was supposed to be under 'Playing Professionally'.
posted by mosch at 11:11 AM on August 4, 2005
posted by RustyBrooks at 2:56 PM on August 4, 2005
Poker Betting Sites
I have really mixed feelings about the no-limit explosion. It's killed my favorite type of holdem (pot-limit), and the skill/luck ratio is so much higher than limit that it's almost unfair to new players.
Hopefully someday all these new recruits will try the other games, and realize that they can be fun too.
posted by mosch at 3:28 PM on August 4, 2005
posted by CCK at 5:14 PM on August 4, 2005
Online Betting Poker
Resources for playing in my first Hold'em tourney?June 3, 2010
QT. Are you kidding me? September 26, 2006
Poker tips for a novice player?December 22, 2005
Big blinds, small blinds confusionApril 23, 2005
Comments are closed.